Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2023 1:11:20 GMT
This month marks 55 years since the publication of the encyclical of Pope Paul VI Humanae vitae. This is probably the most criticised encyclical of the last 100 years. The fallout was so great that Humanae vitae ended up being the last of 7 encyclicals in the pontificate of Paul VI, despite him going on to reign for another ten years. Yet everything Paul VI predicted in the encyclical in terms of what would happen if his advice was not followed actually eventuated. Paul VI was encouraged by the Pontifical Commission set up by John XXIII to reject the age-old teaching of the Church. He refused to do so, even as other Christian communities had done so decades before. Humanae vitae may be the most hated encyclical of the last century - but it is also probably in 2023 one of, if not the most, relevant encyclicals of the last century. If people had just listened to Paul VI, then so much of what became the tragedy of the post-1960s Western world would not have occurred in the first place. Pope Paul VI showed the whole Church that it was possible to accept non-dogmatic changes to the approach of the Church to the world. He was the first Pope to meet with an Orthodox Patriarch of Constantinople in 1000 years. He gave his episcopal ring to the Archbishop of Canterbury. He supported ecumenism, provided it does not "deflect from the true Catholic doctrine". He saw through the reform of the Roman Missal. Yet he also remained steeped in the traditions of the Church and refused to accept any compromise whatsoever on unchangeable doctrines relating to sexual morality, women clergy, the hierarchical structure of the Church, the necessity of understanding the Catholic Church as the true Church of Christ, and the need for doctrinal clarity. If only the world had listened to the prophetic voice of a Pope, who appeared at times to be a loan voice of sensibility crying in the wilderness of dissent of all sides of the Body of Christ. Then we would not be in such a state as we are in now. In 2023, Humanae vitae appears in retrospect not only as a sad lament for what could have been, but as a call from the saintly Paul VI to a radical conversion and an understanding that to be Christian is to accept a path that may at times be difficult, but is directed ultimately towards the hope of mankind - Jesus Christ, Saviour of the World. "Man cannot attain that true happiness for which he yearns with all the strength of his spirit, unless he keeps the laws which the Most High God has engraved in his very nature" - Paul VI, Humanae vitae.
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Jul 24, 2023 3:30:54 GMT
It was an amazing document, and didn't teach anything different than what the Church had always taught, but rather developed the doctrine. In HV, Paul VI delineated three things: - exactly why artificial deliberate prevention of conception is intrinsically evil (contra naturam)
- in response to a legitimate question, demonstrated that "the Pill" was one of these artificial means
- and further explained the legitimate use of natural methods
Needless to say, people at least in the West didn't get the answer they wanted, and it has created a disconnect between the Church's moral teachings on this matter, and how people are willing both to act and to believe regarding this matter. To say "we know this is mortally sinful, but we just don't trust God enough to follow this teaching, we'll take our changes and stay away from the sacraments until we see a way clear not to use contraceptives anymore" is one thing, but to say "this is no sin" is quite another.
The former is human weakness that is easily forgivable --- not condonable, but forgivable --- but the latter brings to mind how the serpent tempted Eve. Again, two different things entirely.
Just seeing things as they are, people make up their minds contraception is not sinful because that's what the world tells them. But the world is not whom we look to for the truth.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2023 3:50:18 GMT
It was an amazing document, and didn't teach anything different than what the Church had always taught, but rather developed the doctrine. In HV, Paul VI delineated three things: - exactly why artificial deliberate prevention of conception is intrinsically evil (contra naturam)
- in response to a legitimate question, demonstrated that "the Pill" was one of these artificial means
- and further explained the legitimate use of natural methods
Needless to say, people at least in the West didn't get the answer they wanted, and it has created a disconnect between the Church's moral teachings on this matter, and how people are willing both to act and to believe regarding this matter. To say "we know this is mortally sinful, but we just don't trust God enough to follow this teaching, we'll take our changes and stay away from the sacraments until we see a way clear not to use contraceptives anymore" is one thing, but to say "this is no sin" is quite another.
The former is human weakness that is easily forgivable --- not condonable, but forgivable --- but the latter brings to mind how the serpent tempted Eve. Again, two different things entirely.
Just seeing things as they are, people make up their minds contraception is not sinful because that's what the world tells them. But the world is not whom we look to for the truth.
Indeed...."My Kingdom is not of this world". Our Lord also had very harsh words for those who mislead the faithful and tell them that certain things are not sinful: "Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened round his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea." (Matt. 18:6). The first step towards the moral degradation of society is the widespread use and availability of contraception. I'd even go a step further and say that Catholic nations should remove the occasion of sin by banning contraceptives except where they are necessary for purposes not directly related to contraception (e.g. certain medical treatments).
|
|
|
Post by ralfy on Jul 28, 2023 7:42:49 GMT
Family planning makes a lot of sense given resource limitations.
|
|