|
Post by ralfy on Jan 7, 2024 2:29:08 GMT
And then there's hope and charity.
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Jan 9, 2024 5:04:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Jan 11, 2024 2:24:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Jan 11, 2024 3:42:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Jan 13, 2024 2:09:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Jan 14, 2024 22:28:53 GMT
And this from Fr Gerald Murray: www.lifesitenews.com/news/fr-murray-fiducia-supplicans-pope-francis/Utterly lacking in docility and totally bereft of discernment. What in the world is the Church going to do about him? I met Fr Murray in passing back in the 1980s, at a CUF event in upstate New York. It was simply a greeting, "hello, how are you?", I didn't get to speak with him. Never thought I'd see the day that he'd challenge something a Pope says or does. What is the world coming to?
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Jan 16, 2024 8:45:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Jan 18, 2024 3:15:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Jan 21, 2024 20:01:23 GMT
crisismagazine.com/opinion/the-good-news-about-fiducia-supplicansGood article. One thing about FS, it has forced people to take sides. As to Traditionis custodes, nobody really cares outside of TLM circles on the one hand, and passionate defenders of all things Francis and all things Novus Ordo on the other side ("the EF is getting too popular and a few people are getting ideas they shouldn't be getting, this has to stop"). This is different. You can't not have an opinion.
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Jan 24, 2024 16:43:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Feb 13, 2024 20:23:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Feb 27, 2024 2:28:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by homeschooldad on Mar 21, 2024 14:50:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by iagosan on Mar 21, 2024 19:15:52 GMT
This is an excellent article that all Catholics(clerical or lay) who value their immortal soul should read.
This excerpt in particular immediately jumped out for me.:
LSN: If a priest “blesses” a couple living in adultery or fornication, or a homosexual “couple,” will this invite demonic activity rather than God’s blessings, since he is invoking the name of Christ and the blessed Trinity upon a couple constituted by a mortally sinful sexual relationship?
KC: The real danger in this type blessing is that it affirms the soul in a state of habitual unrepentant mortal sin. And in doing so, this becomes a millstone moment for the priest. What does that mean? “Better that a millstone be tied around his neck and him cast into the sea, than to lead one of these little ones astray.” (Mt 18:6) Very simply, this is a millstone moment for the priest. And [it] needs to be said. As such, this is a very dangerous thing.
LSN: Does the desecration of the priestly office through some sacrilegious activity, such as the attempt to impart a blessing to couple constituted by a sinful sexual relationship, or through the commission of some sexual sin, invite or open a priest up to demonic activity or influence?
KC: It absolutely does. It flings the door wide open. The other thing, too, is the sins of these clerics. There is a list of priests and bishops who have accessed deviant websites and places, such as Grindr, and others that have viewed pornographic material and/or [committed] pedophilia. They’ve been involved in improper things and have improper associations that are known.
They should be suspended, very simply. This needs to be addressed. The fostering and promotion of the homosexual lifestyle and activity among the priesthood is absolutely impermissible. It’s canonically prohibited. And yet this is one that has infiltrated the seminaries to [such] an extent that young, righteous, orthodox men are being drummed out of the seminaries.
|
|